製造業の購買担当者がAIにかわることってあり得るの?
Quality issues can arise in any manufacturing process. However, with the right procedures in place, manufacturing problems can be identified and resolved quickly to minimize disruptions and costs. This article will outline the key steps involved in responding to a quality problem and establishing preventative measures.
The first priority when a quality issue emerges is containment. The manufacturing line needs to be stopped immediately to prevent further production of defective products. All work-in-progress and finished goods need to be quarantined until the root cause can be determined. Inventory tracking is important to isolate what has already been shipped to customers. They will need to be notified and a recall planned if the issue poses a safety risk.
Once containment is achieved, investigation begins. The quality team should review inspection data and customer complaints for clues. They may need to inspect sample products from different production lots under microscopes or test equipment. Process parameters like material composition, machine settings, and environment conditions are examined for any deviations from specifications. Staff from the production, engineering, and maintenance teams can provide insights based on their areas of responsibility. A root cause needs to be confirmed through objective evidence rather than assumptions to guide corrective actions.
If the root cause lies with supplied raw materials or components, the vendor is promptly notified. They may need to sort, rework or replace problematic inventory. More frequent inspections of incoming shipments may be needed until the supplier issue is resolved. An internal process problem requires corrective actions like adjustments, repairs or upgrades to machinery, equipment and tooling. Work instructions and staff training could need revision if human factors contributed to the defects.
Once the underlying cause is determined, a containment plan is developed to address in-process and finished goods as needed. Rework may be possible to salvage some or all products. Sorting can be done to segregate conforming from nonconforming items. A disposition is made on items that cannot be reworked – they may be scrapped, used for non-critical applications or returned to suppliers. The containment plan aims to resolve the quality issues as efficiently as possible before full production resumes.
A root cause report documents the investigation activities, findings and containment actions. It forms the basis for long term prevention. If the problem was due to a one-time deviation or incident, additional monitoring and controls put in place should be sufficient going forward. However, if it points to a more systemic issue, further process improvements are needed. Equipment or methods may require redesigns. Procedures could be enhanced through tools like failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to strengthen vulnerable points. Staff roles and responsibilities may need clarification to establish accountability.
The quality system also needs updating. Control plans and work instructions are revised to incorporate the additional controls. Inspection criteria are adjusted as required. Staff are retrained on the changes. Objective criteria are established to verify effectiveness and validate that the problem has been permanently corrected. Statistical process controls can help identify variation early to prevent defects.
Finally, it is important to communicate closure of the issue to all relevant stakeholders. Customers are informed of the resolution if they were impacted. Management oversees implementation of preventative measures and signs off when the investigation is fully completed. Continuous improvement efforts keep refining processes to further reduce quality risks over the long term. With a well-defined resolution process in place, manufacturing problems can be turned into opportunities to strengthen the overall quality system.
調達購買業務の効率化だけでなく、システムを導入することで、コスト削減や製品・資材のステータス可視化のほか、属人化していた購買情報の共有化による内部不正防止や統制にも役立ちます。