Manufacturing DX Design

Manufacturing DX is determined by
"design" — before implementation.

Deploying tools alone won't move the floor.
That's why we spend 3–12 months in focused design
to build a DX structure that keeps running.

Design Period

3 / 6 / 12 Months

Deliverables

DX Roadmap
To-Be Workflows
Operating Model

Target Teams

Management, Procurement, Sales
R&D, Quality, Finance
General Affairs, and more

Manufacturing DX stalls —
and the root cause isn't on the shop floor.

Tool adoption becomes the goal

Processes are not defined

Progress stalls between departments

No operating rules in place

Roles and accountability are unclear

No visible results — teams give up

That's why NEWJI DX delivers "design" — not just implementation.

Discuss Your DX Design

NEWJI DX is a "Design Lab" —
purpose-built for DX design.

Before selecting tools or building systems, we design the structures that make your organization move.

Why we act

DX Vision

We design the shared language — a clear "why" that both leadership and the shop floor can align on.

What comes first

DX Roadmap

We prioritize workflows, resources, and risks, then build a 3–12 month action plan.

Keeps running

DX Operating Model

We define who does what and when, with clear weekly/monthly operating rules and accountability.

First, digitize — then make operations flow

STEP 1

Digitization

The first stage: consolidate data scattered across paper, fax, and Excel into a single source and make information visible.

  • Digitizing paper slips
  • Registering fax orders in a system
  • Moving from Excel management to a database
STEP 2

Digitalization

The second stage: redesign business processes and use data to automate and drive operational efficiency.

  • Business process redesign
  • Approval process automation
  • Cross-department coordination optimization

Most companies stall after digitizing data. →NEWJI takes you all the way to a "self-running" operating design.

Everything we design in your DX engagement

As-Is Process Inventory

Visualize current workflow

Issue Register

Document all identified challenges

To-Be Workflow

Design the target-state process

DX Roadmap

3–12 month action plan

Organization Design

Define roles and accountability

Operating Rules

Weekly/monthly operating cadence

Approval & Authorization Design

Optimize decision-making flow

Tool Selection

Right-sized tool recommendations

KPI Design

Define measurement metrics

DX Design Plans

Focused Design Engagement: 3–12 months

3 Months

DX Design Sprint

900,000 JPY (excl. tax) ≈ US$6,000


Best for

Companies that want to start small

How it works

  1. 1Current-state analysis (1 month)
  2. 2Design & planning (1.5 months)
  3. 3Launch preparation (0.5 months)

Key deliverables

  • As-Is Process Inventory
  • Issue Register
  • To-Be Workflow
Discuss this plan →

12 Months

DX Design Partner

2,880,000 JPY (excl. tax) ≈ US$19,200

approx. 240,000 JPY/month


Best for

Companies pursuing long-term organizational transformation

How it works

  1. 1Current-state analysis (2 months)
  2. 2Design & planning (5 months)
  3. 3Adoption support (5 months)

Key deliverables

  • All DX Design Standard deliverables
  • Approval & Authorization Design
  • Tool Selection
  • KPI Design
Discuss this plan →

* All prices exclude tax. USD figures are approximate, calculated at the exchange rate at the time of writing (1 USD ≈ 150 JPY), and are for reference only.

DX Companion Plans

After the design phase, we stay alongside you as a partner through the execution journey.

Monthly

Online Coaching

200,000 JPY/month (excl. tax) ≈ US$1,333/mo


Best for

Companies that are self-driving DX execution after design and want periodic expert guidance

What's included

  • 2 online check-ins per month (60 min each)
  • Async chat Q&A
  • Progress reviews and course corrections
  • Tool setup and configuration support
  • Internal training session planning
Discuss this plan →

Monthly

On-Site Coaching

Contact us


Best for

Companies that need a partner embedded on-site — factory floor, warehouse, or office visits required

What's included

  • All Online Coaching content
  • 1–2 on-site visits per month
  • On-site interviews and process observation
  • Direct dialogue with internal key stakeholders
  • Co-attendance at executive progress reviews
Discuss this plan →

The right tool isn't about "good vs. bad" —
it's determined by your scale and how it will be operated.

We help you select the tools that fit your challenges and company size.

Task Management

Notion

  • Start with: task board
  • Common pitfall: structure becomes too complex
Notion

Asana

  • Start with: project management
  • Common pitfall: abandoned due to underutilization
Asana

Todoist

  • Start with: project management
  • Common pitfall: abandoned due to underutilization
Todoist

Communication

Slack

  • Start with: channel structure
  • Common pitfall: notification overload leads to disengagement
Slack

Teams

  • Start with: video meetings
  • Common pitfall: confusion from running in parallel with email
Teams

LINE WORKS

  • Start with: video meetings
  • Common pitfall: confusion from running in parallel with email
LINE WORKS

Workflow Automation

n8n

  • Start with: simple integrations
  • Common pitfall: can't keep up with error handling
n8n

Zapier

  • Start with: approval flows
  • Common pitfall: building too many automations without a design plan
Zapier

Power Automate

  • Start with: approval flows
  • Common pitfall: building too many automations without a design plan
Power Automate

Recommended Tools for Manufacturing

From the wide range of DX tools available globally, we recommend the optimal fit for your vision and workflows.

Supplier Management Order Management Procurement Inventory Management Production Management Quality Management Cost Management Accounting / Billing / Payments Forms / OCR Workflow Automation Collaboration Drawing / Spec Management

If you'd like guidance on how to organize your manufacturing operations for DX, reach out for a consultation.


In-Person Productivity Tools

Notta Memo

Notta Memo Learn more

Plaud

Plaud Learn more

Typeless

Typeless Learn more
Talk to Us Now

Use AI to gather the information you need to decide.

AI tools are not all-powerful. We design the right usage pattern for your workflows.

Meeting Minutes Automation

Best for: teams with heavy meeting schedules

Requirement: integration with video conferencing tools

Recommended tools

First-Response Ticket Handling

Best for: customer support teams

Requirement: organized FAQ content

Recommended tools

Specification Organization

Best for: design and engineering teams

Requirement: documentation already digitized

Recommended tools

Companywide AI Adoption

Best for: company-wide rollout

Requirement: internal policies on confidential data and input templates in place

Recommended tools

Use AI agents to delegate execution.

Once the data is ready, it's time to act. From routine tasks to code generation, agents move autonomously.

Claude Code

Claude Code - Anthropic Learn more

Devin

Devin - AI Software Engineer Learn more

Case studies: building a design that doesn't fail — before implementation

Companies that were stuck in design — and how they started moving.

Precision Equipment Manufacturer

126 employees


Before

Why it stalled

Order management ran on fax and Excel with tribal knowledge. One absence brought operations to a halt.

Approach

What we designed

As-Is process inventory → Order management flow redesign → Tool selection criteria

After

How it runs now

Visualizing the workflow locked in operating rules before any tool was deployed.

Interior Products Manufacturer

458 employees


Before

Why it stalled

Three DX tools were deployed, but the shop floor never adopted them — all abandoned.

Approach

What we designed

Usage analysis → Department-level To-Be design → Phased rollout planning

After

How it runs now

Consolidated to 2 tools in 6 months. Adoption rate exceeded 80%.

Food Processing Company

82 employees


Before

Why it stalled

Quality control data was paper-based, making traceability compliance difficult.

Approach

What we designed

Current form analysis → Data field design → Operating model and accountability design

After

How it runs now

Operating design completed before digitization, enabling a smooth system rollout.

Metal Fabrication Company

40 employees


Before

Why it stalled

Too many suppliers with quote comparison and lead time responses depending on one person. Cost and lead-time judgment criteria were tribal knowledge, causing growing rework.

Approach

What we designed

As-Is process inventory → Defining decision criteria → Quote-to-PO flow design → Approval & authorization design → KPI design

After

How it runs now

Purchase order decisions were standardized — anyone could make the same quality call. Emergency responses dropped and lead time delay risks became visible.

Resin Molding Company

22 employees


Before

Why it stalled

Defect and complaint handling was reactive with no recurrence prevention. Inspection records were scattered, making tracing time-consuming.

Approach

What we designed

Quality To-Be design → Unified inspection and recording rules → Exception handling flow (defect / correction / re-inspection / shipping hold) → Weekly/monthly operating model design

After

How it runs now

Inspection and corrective decisions became consistent. Recurrence prevention became standard practice. "Where to stop" was clearly defined, speeding up quality response.

Industrial Machinery Parts Manufacturer

15 employees


Before

Why it stalled

Maintenance requests were scattered across email and phone, causing missed responses. Priority and assignment were unclear, leading to customer response delays.

Approach

What we designed

Inquiry channel consolidation → Receipt-to-resolution To-Be design → SLA and priority rules → RACI-based accountability → KPI design (first-response and completion time)

After

How it runs now

Response priority and accountability became clear, stabilizing customer service. Progress visibility strengthened coordination between sales and service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where do we start?

Start with a free 30-minute consultation. We'll listen to your current challenges and recommend the right plan. You don't need to decide on next steps until after that conversation.

Can we also request implementation (system development)?

Yes. After the design phase, we'll clarify development scope, team structure, and budget before proposing a path forward.

How much internal time will this require?

We design the engagement to minimize your internal load. We'll show the required time commitment based on your current situation and team.

Can we consult before selecting any tools?

Absolutely. We'll start from your requirements, compare candidates, and build selection criteria from scratch.

Can we use an IT subsidy?

It depends on your situation. We'll work through the eligible scope and application requirements together.

Do you work with small companies (under 50 employees)?

Yes. We tailor the design scope and approach to match your scale.

Can everything be done online?

Yes. We run discovery, design sessions, and reviews entirely online.

Do you support NDAs?

Yes. We can execute an NDA using either your template or ours.

Just tell us why your DX has stalled.

A 30-minute free consultation will clarify your next step.

You cannot copy content of this page